I’m pleasantly surprised that I know how to place each of these words in the right order in order to form meaning. I realize that I might be wrong and that this is only understood by me, but smearing the odd ball on the right knee isn’t left of the mixed price show. So if these words are nothing but collections of the odd ones out, it might be appropriate that such is the name of this wonderful lizard’s eye, reflecting sorrow behind the ears of the wicked.
If, however, these words that are placed one after the other are understood by you then I shall say this, “Is it that you refuse to be remembered as the odd one out, or that everyone is the odd one out? For if it is the latter, which it surely must be, then lambs running along the river’s edge smile only on the fury of the meek – the patter of those without hoofs sings the bleak future a lullaby that is meant not to inspire but to belittle.”
That being said, and hopefully understood, we move into familiar territory. The sandy beaches of grammar, where some may drown in the present perfect passive because they refuse to take action. “Moving arms isn’t not for me.” they say, and thus are saved by a typo – an unlikely hero. While the lucky ones stumble to safety, tripping on double negatives and run-on sentences, others die of thirst because they refuse to drink in the horrible taste of, “Fuck, what was that again? Is this right? What’s that meant to do?” – and who can really blame them? Rather, precision – was that it?
It appears that we’ve reached the end of this little run-on life. An afterthought meant to be real, like popcorn killing pigeons, or that second moon people never took to. “It can not grow anymore.” they say, “Having lost all interest in the sun, it no longer wishes to face it.” So, let’s face it, there ain’t no plural nor singular parents that are to guide those that read to beautiful green fields, where butterflies make music as they fornicate. And, surely, we can agree that the notion of a pit of snakes waiting for Indiana Jones ain’t worth a nickle in a wishing well. But of course…
…looking for a vole in the entrails of an insane elephant does not justify a world void of certainty. There must be those who equate exploration to 2+2, like scaling walls of snakes that represent, or are meant to represent, or will represent, or represented, but only because a wall like that couldn’t stand alone, without meaning it would fall to its respected pieces and slither away into a hole. A hole not inhabited by that same vole who seconds earlier was eaten by an insane elephant, not for nourishment but for entertainment.
-Jakob Lint